|
|
 |
Join us on FaceBook | |
 |
Submit Your Code | |
 |
Poker Tournaments | |
|
Poker Guide for Developers | |
 |
SEO Monitor | |
 |
UpTime Monitor | |
 |
My Favorite Examples | |
|
My Favorite Articles | |
 |
Update Your Profile |
| More Weber Sites | ||
| PHP Code Search | ||
| Web Development Forums | ||
| Learn MySQL Playing Trivia | ||
| PHPBB2 Templates | ||
| Web Development Resources | ||
| Web Development Content | ||
| Internet Security Software | ||
| Recommended Links | ||
| PHPClasses | ||
| PHP Editor | ||
| PHP Jobs | ||
| Vision.To Design | ||
| Ajax Tutorials | ||
| PHP Programming Help | ||
| PHP/MySQL Programming | ||
| Webmaster Resources | ||
| Webmaster Forum | ||
| XML meta language | ||
| website builder | ||
| Recommended | ||
| פרייסז - הכח לקנות עובר לידיים שלך | ||
| Texas Holdem Poker Evangelists | ||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Code | ||||||||||
Paul Stavrides wrote: > Could someone relate their experiences with Fusion (or Fusion Teams) > as it releates to PHP3, Apache, and Unix hosted sites? Fusion is not server dependent, and I develop on Windows and server on Unix. For a total offline solution you can get PHP3 for Win32 MySQL for Win32 and Apache for Win32 (although I use PWS) and this works fine for testing locally.Below are my thoughts on Fusion and some responses to other questions in this thread. I have been using Fusion for about a year starting with v2 and I now use v3. I admit that 2.0 lacked some the needed interaction with the source. But I think that NetObjects have recognized that shortcoming and have made viable solutions in v3. I use PHP on all of our sites and use Fusion to build them all. There are a couple of different ways to touch the source when you need to. First you can insert code into the individual tags and what you put in there is what you get output from Fusion. I have't had problems with this. Or, you can create a text box in the layout of your page and just insert your PHP code into that are that is created via right clicking in the text box and choosing Object Html... Finally, you can reference HTML from an external source. Basically creating a big area that will be reserved for the HTML that is located in another app such as Homesite, FP, or Notepad. Fusion will not touch this. I rarely have to go this route. Usually the Object Html... route is very sufficient. Although you can never get as precise as a text editor like Homesite (bundled with Fusion) Fusion gives you sufficient work arounds if require and ones that don't require a change in PHP (i.e. <script language= \"PHP\">). And I think that Fusion pays off in the site managment aspect that is valuable for the novice that you can have contributing to the site (that work run from a text editor). Also, I admit that I have only used dreamweaver briefly, the WYSIWYG there doesn't compare to Fusion's. WYSIWYG and site mgmnt is important to me in shared projects. As for Fusions generated code, it has been lightened in v3. You can choose the method used in generating the HTML, you can choose CSS and Layers, small file size, but only for the 4.0 browsers, or Nested Tables that have a tendency to render slowly, or finally Regular tables, using this method, the page renders quickly and code is kept lite. I have compared filesize in an intricate Fusion page compared to the same page generated in FP and the file size is pretty equal. Just my thoughts though, Michael Stearne | ||||||||||
| Related Code Examples | ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| User Comments | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
